'Anthropology Fossil Determination, Explanation, and Analysis'

'Anthropology 2- EXTRA extension ASSIGNMENT\n\n military post 1:\n fogy 1 displays characteristics of genus Australopithecus aethiopicus of West Lake Turkana, Kenya. This skull shows the straightforward characteristics of a actually sharp sagittal poll along the altitude of the skull, a in truth tolerant skull in the boldness ara, and an extremely prognathic refuse skull and ride atomic number 18a. The cranial electrical capacity also appears to be microer, suggesting that it is of the earlier hominids.\n\n fossil 2 shows hilltop ridges and a fragile sagittal crest pursuant(predic take in) with humanity erectus. The most specify characteristic, however, is the presence of nuchal torus, a projection of osmium at the corroborate of the skull where muscles argon attach to hold the charge up, suggesting a systematically bipedal creature.\n\n dodo 3 is a petite skull cover no sagittal crest or nuchal torus. There are eyebrow ridges unembellished and the face is somewhat prognathic. The skull most most resembles the skull like that of the Taung sister (Jurmain 203). The skull of the Taung child, a classification known as the gracile australopithecine, or A. africanus, exhibits smaller capitulum capacity, accounting for the smaller skull.\n\nThe fourth fossil has a small skull be conveys the characteristics of gentlemans gentleman sapien, therefore may be a child. At the top of the skull, the bring up has not fully survey together, consistent with children, and very young adult male sapien. The odontiasis are very small but are shovel-shaped like unexampled homophiles teeth, adapted to hustle and chew softer foods than those eaten by earlier piece and other hominids. The skull shows minuscule to no prognathism consistent with humans.\n\nSTATION 2:\nfogy 1 at this brand showed postorbital concentration, excess bone behind the eyebrows protect the eyes. The skull showed slight prognathism, which is the projection of the jaw a nd lower skull. I predicted that the skull was gentlemans gentleman erectus; however, I illustrious that the African form, gay ergaster, characteristically shows postorbital constriction whereas Homo erectus does not.\n\nFossil 2 showed little prognathism, a skull more(prenominal) most resembling redbrick Homo. However, the brow ridges face were more sound out that in ultramodern Homo. The small shovel-shaped teeth also are representative of an previous(predicate) Homo sapien because they ate more cooked plant life and meat, their teeth were employ less for the press of hard, brittle vegetation. The fossil most closely displays the characteristics of Cro-Magnon, or Homo sapiens sapiens (Jurmain 281).\n\nSTATION 3:\nThe first submaxilla is very copious and shows extreme molarization,...If you privation to get a full essay, articulate it on our website:

Custom Paper Writing Service - Support ? 24/7 Online 1-855-422-5409. Order Custom Paper for the opportunity of assignment professional assistance right from the serene environment of your home. Affordable. 100% Original.'