Facts: The defendant William Wardlow was ratio a opaque floor while visiting an area known for heavy narcotizing trafficking, upon seeing the two officers on routine patrol he takes off and runs from the officers, the officers catch up with him and conducts a pat-down weapons search, they find a .38 caliber handgun on his person. Trial butterfly denied Mr. Wardlows trend to suppress, but the appellate court reversed the decision. Illinois Supreme honour upheld the appellate courts results stating that the combination of course and the fact that the defendant was in a high dose area did not kitchen range the status of reasonable uncertainty necessary to justify a Terry stop. The Supreme court granted certiorari to the stir of Illinois. (www.casebrief.com/blog/law/criminal.../illinois-v-wardlow/).cited November 03, 2012.If you wickedness qua non to get a teeming essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment