Sophocles' 'Oedipus The King' - Was Oedipus a victim of hubris or a victim of the gods?

The mess of Oedipus was bitter indeed. By the end of Oedipus the King, he and his necessity are elaten as ill-omened (Ln 1195) and objects to envy non at every(prenominal) (Ln 1196). But what was it that caused this gentleman to respite with his mother and deteriorate his obtain? What was it that Oedipus fell victim to? Was it the hubris that calculateed to so permeate his parting? Was he a puppet held in the cruel becharm of the gods? It would seem that perhaps it was neither of these and that sort of these social functions combined unitedly as Oedipus fell victim to chance. If the pot of Oedipus was a penalty so it was a great nonpareil and only(a) and therefore necessity bind been caused by a mammoth wickedness. The largest sin we see in the play is obviously parricide and incest, which Dodds claims were the sterling(prenominal) a man back end commit (Dodds). But this go off not be what he was punished for as it was his punishment. The twain can not be the same. Therefore another sin must be searched for and the one most commonly darned is his hubris. The hubris of Oedipus is most homely in his dealings with Creon and the rail line that is subsequent drawn surrounded by his own actions and those of Creon. Oedipus is certain that Creon has betrayed him and lie to him.

He ignores the innocent mans protests and he sentences Creon to death saying No, for sure; kill you, not discharge you. (Ln 625) This was a terrible thing to do, a decision attract rashly, a decision do with much hubris. The point is impellent all the more precipitously when Creon later says, ...when I sink knowledge I choose not to speak at random. (Ln 1546) A strong contrast is drawn between the... If you essential to get a adequate essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper