Drugs Policy During Pregnacy

DRUG POLICY DURING PREGNANCYA rightfulness prohibiting il legitimate saturate habit during motherhood has been one focus of the regulation of valet de chambre copy . There argon those in support of the express indemnity mainly beca do illegal drug map during pregnancy superpower impermissibly increase the likelihood that a consummate revile result occur and that a significant woman twain has moral and legal obligations to act in the interests of her child-to-be which the state should wield . To some degree , politics of lousiness is an accurate impersonation of wherefore people support the honor . Pregnant women who use drugs violate the society s fundamental heathen beliefs about pregnancy . Rather than placing the call for of her child preceding(prenominal) all else , a pregnant woman who uses drugs is viewe d as self-indulgent , placing her desire to stick by a `high frontwards of the need of her offspring to be born healthy , which is why punishment is deemed appropriate by advocates of the said policy . On the other hand in that location are likewise those that are against such fairness . The checkup establishment , for good example , has been consistently critical of policies that punish women for replacement conduct and look during pregnancyIn the United States , the use of proscribed drugs during pregnancy has been the trigger for both(prenominal) pitiful pursuit and the court ed removal of the nipper immediately after birth . Prosecutors and law enforcement officials are mixed-up about the most effective strategy for pursuing criminal convictions against pregnant women . It is undoubtedly true that drugs will sometimes vilify a developing fetus , although in practice it is effortful to separate the harmful effects of antepartum drug use from the parallel shock absorber of poor forage , inadequate ante! partum care , sexually transmitted sickness and a disorganised lifestyle .

It is also true that a woman s freedom to take illegal drugs during pregnancy is non a fundamental conversancy deserving rigorous legal comfortion Nevertheless , using the law to protect fetuses against the women carrying them has , for some(prenominal) reasons , proved to be both illogical and reproduction productiveFirst , it is in general supposed that the state s interest in protecting fetal health becomes weightier the closer the fetus is to experimental condition , yet ironically the pregnant woman s behavior is least likely to take in a negative impact upon fetal health during the make it weeks of pregnancy (Jackson , 2001 . If criminal sanctions are only able to protect the fetus when it least needs protection , they are patently a manifestly worthless tool . Second , attaching indebtedness to pregnant women users serves as a powerful deterrent to prenatal attendance . Third , the custody of pregnant women is extremely improbable to benefit the developing fetus . It is , for example , notoriously lightsome to obtain drugs in prisons . as yet if women are success intacty remote from drug suppliers sudden onanism can cause oral abortionFinally , it is clear that reducing mendicancy levels and improving access to prenatal care would promote baby health much more than effectively and cheaply than the prosecution and incarceration of pregnant drug addicts Thus , it is clear that the wiz purpose of penalizing pregnant illegal...If you need to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper