France and Russia Semi-Presidential Systems Analysis Essay

France and Russia Semi-Presidential Systems Analysis - Essay ExampleDemocracy is simply mute as highly associated with freedom. On the contrary, it would be a bit harder to define authoritarianism due to the particular that it is quite supple and diverse in its form. In other words, it is very interesting to find bug out why some countries ended up themselves in authoritarian regime knowing the fact that in that location is no individual freedom associated with it. In addition, it is very complex and non everyone could substantially express their freedom. At some point, there must suppression of individual rights involved. After all, authoritarianism requires absolute obedience to authority. This is the introductory requirement in authoritarian regime contrary to emancipation of individual freedom in elective regime. In democratic regime, it is the people who have the higher authority to select among themselves somebody to be pose in the higher rank, to represent their voices . Submission therefore to this instituted authority would mean complete obedience and appreciate of the voice of the majority. In this case, it is always the majority wins and has ultimate right over the minority. This only means that for as long as there are minority groups, democratic regime should always subject itself to vary amendments in many aspects in governance. For instance, the emancipation of law should at some point be allowed to undergo process of voting prior to its implementation. In the legalization of abortion, democratic regime always has the chance for check by the majority. Substantial debates are necessary just to make sure that everybodys possible voices on the said subject area are heard. On the contrary, one could always associate authoritarianism with dictatorship, monarchy, one-man rule, autarchy and even police state. This what it means about authoritarianism being diverse. In democracy, the rulers are restricted by a constitution, law and even oppos itions such as the minority group and even some insurgents. However, this is not the case in the issue of authoritarian regime. There is a repressive control of the people in authoritarianism. Seeing these definitions and illustrations of authoritarianism and democracy would somehow suggest that it would be impossible why countries remarkably intermeshed themselves with authoritarian regime. It is important to look at this issue in detail most especially in the case of Russia. In this paper, the proponent tries to elaborate some factors that could probably explain why Russia has slid into competitive authoritarianism. ground on history, Russia like France has semi-presidential systems. However, France chose to remain democratic but Russia decided to slide into competitive authoritarianism. There are many probable factors that one could elaborate for the reason of acquiring substantial explanation. However, in this paper, the proponent chose to hold forth one of the most important factors considered to be elemental for the institution of authoritarian regime in Russia. This is the issue concerning democratic value. Democratic value People lack democratic values. Perhaps, this is a good point to start with. In Russia, history could tell that in its archaic society, the leaders always decide for the people. People were never thought to decide among themselves and thus lacking responsibility and freedom to think of different things for the good of the country. This is a remarkable impact and